Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Arnold
More so that the current ratings again are only about 25% of his overall ratings. More time gives the current ratings a larger portion of his ratings, and so assuming he keeps playing at that rate, should keep moving up. But yeah, they don't just move all at once.
|
The fact it's capped at 8 means it's a hard cap, which doesn't make sense from a data set point. The Bellinger thing is fine, he doesn't necessarily have to be a 100.
However, you're basically telling me a second year player who is a 60 to start will only be a 68 after hitting .400 with 15 home runs if his initial rating is a 60.
No one is asking for every player to jump dramatically, but the #8 just seems like a really random number to use across the board. If there is a cap shouldn't it be more like:
90+ player cap at 8
80+ player cap at 10
70+ player cap at 12
60+ player cap at 15
50+ player cap at 20
(random numbers, not actual data)
The 50/60 rated players are basically unusable until August, is what you're saying. Just doesn't feel right.