View Single Post
Old 05-30-2004, 07:53 PM   #10
Bluenoser
Hall Of Famer
 
Bluenoser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In The Moment
Posts: 14,487
1. I guess it depends on what kind of accuracy you're looking for then. Going back to 1901 and for quite some time onward, player movement, when it came to trading, was almost non-existent. IMO realism doesn't "cheapen" a historical league. But everyone has their own idea's on that.

2. Hmmm, not sure what to make of this answer. In #1 you said there is hardly no trading and plenty of rebuilding, which is historically accurate. In #2 you're saying the historical accuracy is destroyed. Sorry, but I'm confused here. Which do you prefer, historical accuracy or not?

Anyway, not trying to start a debate here, was just curious as to your reasons for the two statements. Thanks for the explanation.
Bluenoser is offline   Reply With Quote