OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post

mking55 · 01-26-2004, 05:17 PM

Mr. Wildhawke,

I am in agreement with you. Although I feel there is nothing wrong with people rating the fighters the way they see fit, I don't think it is for me.

As I mentioned earlier, I am not qualified to take on such a task and feel the same way about the difficulities and pitfalls as you do.

That is the reason for these posts I make (Lem Franklin and now Greg Page). I want to know if they are rated correctly in the game developers eyes (Trunzos) or not. If there is an error, they can correct it for me (such as Jim did with Lem Franklin). I don't want to have to figure out what to correct. "It's not my job".

If the rating is correct and I am wrong, then tell me why and I will adjust my thinking and understand the game better.

I do not want to 'tweak' fighters. I want the makers of the game to tell me exactly what to make the ratings. They are the 'experts' and I bought the product to use their expertise.

01-26-2004, 05:17 PM	#19
mking55 All Star Starter Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Boading, China Posts: 1,249	Mr. Wildhawke, I am in agreement with you. Although I feel there is nothing wrong with people rating the fighters the way they see fit, I don't think it is for me. As I mentioned earlier, I am not qualified to take on such a task and feel the same way about the difficulities and pitfalls as you do. That is the reason for these posts I make (Lem Franklin and now Greg Page). I want to know if they are rated correctly in the game developers eyes (Trunzos) or not. If there is an error, they can correct it for me (such as Jim did with Lem Franklin). I don't want to have to figure out what to correct. "It's not my job". If the rating is correct and I am wrong, then tell me why and I will adjust my thinking and understand the game better. I do not want to 'tweak' fighters. I want the makers of the game to tell me exactly what to make the ratings. They are the 'experts' and I bought the product to use their expertise.