View Single Post
Old 03-28-2026, 12:50 PM   #48
jpeters1734
Hall Of Famer
 
jpeters1734's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Juust a bit outside...
Posts: 6,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by snepp View Post
I'm going to throw out my post from another thread...

Quote:
"Realistic" looking draft class = "Not fun" and players whine

Top prospects "always" decline = "Not fun" and players whine

It's a straight up lose/lose proposition, the devs simply can't win here.
May as well add "not realistic" looking draft class = players whine (my camp)

I don't envy the balancing act required here. The "dual" prospect grading is an interesting approach though, a bit like an expansion on the development risk grading.
I think the answer is simple. If people are going to whine regardless, the focus should be on what is realistic.
__________________
"Cannonball Coming!" Go Bucs!!

Founder and League Caretaker of the Professional Baseball Circuit, www.probaseballcircuit.com

An Un-Official Guide to Minor League Management in OOTP 21

Ratings Scale Conversion Cross-Reference Cheat Sheet
jpeters1734 is offline   Reply With Quote