Quote:
Originally Posted by pilight
Like I said, you are arbitrarily picking which rules are acceptable to break and which ones are not. It's not that "rule breakers lack integrity & character and don't deserved to be honored as the best the game produced." It's that players who you believe did something you disapprove of should be barred. It's an entirely subjective criteria and not a good one.
|
No its not. You choose to look at it as arbitrary. I look at it as reasonable. You want to let in anyone no matter what they do. That reasonable? Hey!, let's put in anyone who ever played the game. I mean Ozzie Smith has 28 career HR's. So anyone who reaches 28 homers should get in, correct? Or else I'm arbitrary? Mariano Rivera has only 82 wins. If he is in, I gotta put every pitcher in w/82 right? You know, for the sake of not being "arbitrary". Right? Or else I'm picking and choosing which stats should get in. That's your position right? Or is that unreasonable?
I'm not being arbitrary. I and the HOF voters have a set standard in their minds & they measure candidates on that standard. We use our power of reason to judge whose "record, playing ability, integrity, sportsmanship, character, and contributions to the team(s) on which the player played" merits entrance to the Hall. The whole picture.
Reason.
__________________
If a man is guilty
4 what goes on inside of his mind,
then let me get the electric chair
4 all my future crimes.
- Prince
Batdance
June 7, 1958 - Apr 21, 2016
Don't fall for the spin