|
In my - admittedly, somewhat limited - experience using this type of strategy, I have found that the game really struggles to keep up with wild swings. So if you followed like 1916 or 1968 with a high-steroid-era season, you have a fair chance of some hinky results. The game usually takes a few seasons to find its groove and this seems to keep it from doing so.
Now, it being RD means you're perhaps not looking for exactitude with historical replication of stat outputs. In which case, this probably isn't a problem. Worth noting, all the same.
G
|