Quote:
Originally Posted by Rain King
Whether it leads to a visible improvement can depend on what rating scale you are using. A player can improve quite a bit without bumping up to the next level on a 13-point scale (i.e. 20-80 by 5's). That scale is covering 550 rating points under the hood...and the lower you are on the scale the bigger the gap before hitting the next level if you are looking at things compared to MLB players.
|
That makes perfect sense. Thanks.
(hypothetically speaking, because I don't know what the actual numbers are....) If a rating of 50 requires 400 points, and you have to get to 450 points to reach a 55 rating. I can understand not seeing a ratings improvement while your player technically improves from 402 to 438.
What I still don't get is why the ratings for my players seem to consistently go *down* after successful training -- sometimes massively, or why a player wouldn't get credit for successfully learning a new position.
If anyone knows of a good guide that explain the numerical mechanics behind the lab (ie. how talent points are awarded/deducted based on the relative success/failure of the training) I would love to read it.