Quote:
Originally Posted by jcard
It really is a little late in the day for the game to still have such prominent flaws. I saw a post where the user held an expansion draft and the reigning MVP was left unprotected (good intangibles, popularity, etc., as well). Examples like the one being discussed here or the sign / release transaction cyclotron point to a primitive roster management AI, resulting in these edge cases where individual transactions might be defensible in isolation but when considered longitudinally.
|
I have to ask, and please don't take this the wrong way, do you use a thesaurus when making your posts? Seems like there are always a lot of big words, but something feels missing.
Cyclotron? That's a particle accelerator. Do you mean the sign and release transaction cycle?
And the last sentence. "but when considered longitudinally." Shouldn't there be more words after? What should we consider in the long-term? Should it be that the edge cases make sense (there's always someone that needs to be cut) but when looking at the big picture, teams should not be cycling between the same few players. It's quite unclear exactly what you're getting to
It's just interesting seeing all these uncommon phrases in a few sentences: prominent, cyclotron, primitive, defensible, isolation, longitudinal. Happens on a few other comments too. For what it's worth, this may cause confusion with others as it seems to take away from some of the good points you make