Quote:
Originally Posted by thehef
I'm surprised nobody in this thread - in all the discussions of whether he was guilty or not - points to that book.
|
I listened to the book on audible after i had already came to the conclusion he actually did do it.
If i had not then that book and the book Outrage would certainly help.
To me it was him confessing without confessing.
If he was just trying to make money then why not write a book on he thought did it? Why put your self in the story?
Its like someone accuses you of robbing a safe.
You say i didn't do it but i would rob the safe this way which just happens to match the way it was robbed.
I have no idea of why OJ thought the book would be a good idea.
He would lose any profits to the Goldmans and it would be suspected by the public even more.
Why not write a book on why i am innocent.
Yeah that book was just weird thing for him to do.