View Single Post
Old 04-05-2024, 06:54 AM   #161
FantasyDrafter
Minors (Double A)
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirMichaelJordan View Post
In this case, he will lose speed faster when he ages than he would if it was at default or higher...

Long story short "Development focus" is probably the wrong name to use for this feature. Its confusing people.
That is a great hypothesis. Based on Will’s comments I think that was the intent. Over many seasons there is no evidence that happens, certainly not at any rate that should deter anyone from doing it. Entire organizations (approx 75% in my case anyway) with zero in the speed bar should be noticeable.

What could be confusing is that there are so many “notches” in the bars, especially if it is really a ratio. That is 100% visual fluff. In ratio terms, if you think of it as:

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - this is balanced

2 2 0 2 1 0 0 - this is how I set it up, as extreme as possible. Not with one player, with an organization. Zero (min) doesn’t give a noticeable penalty and 2 (max) doesn’t give a noticeable bump.

Those with faith it works or are happy that you can’t really deviate a players outcome with focus think this is good I guess. For those who do like this, don’t use the lab, because while daily focus or ignorance over many seasons might help turn a final editor number from 420 to 425 (if I want to believe) the lab can turn 420 into 460+ in one offseason.

Personally I think daily focus should have more impact. Positive and negative.
FantasyDrafter is offline   Reply With Quote