Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel_09
I would like to believe that one through Development Focus can "try" to change the development path of a player, but I have read several people who have not observed significant changes in this issue, to the point of recommending that the AI be handled for all players.
|
Users can test and decide based on whatever they think their test shows. I'd take their tests with a grain of salt. I'm not saying they aren't seeing exactly what they report, but with regard to this brand new feature what is significant? What should one expect? Hard questions to answer without knowing the underlying code. Also does one even want to know the exact changes the code will deliver? I'm sure some do, while others like me would prefer that to remain hidden by fog of war. That's my humble opinion.
The only testing I have done on development focus (not the lab) is to "ask the AI" before making any changes. From what I have seen in those recommendations I would not allow the AI to make decisions on players I care about. Way to extreme for my taste and often take away from areas I would never take away from. I don't think I have kept one of the AI recommended development programs on any player I look on as a possible MLBer. For players I don't care about I will ask the AI, and sometimes use it's plan, thinking maybe I'll catch lighting in a bottle, but I'm not holding my breath.
As to what the developer has said?
Will Beh's response..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Will Beh
Granted, this implementation of the AI is brand new, and I am 100% sure that people will be able to better optimize it. It's possible that the crappy development report you got is just unlucky; I still recommend manually changing it for players you are invested it.
|