Quote:
Originally Posted by DcS
I was a bit unsure about my previous year results so I did this on the 4 programs that looked like they were going to succeed. Here's my results day before and day of (including a decrease after a successful program)
H Davis - 27 YO - "Outstanding" Batspeed
- Before: POW 421/417/415
- After: POW 427/427/422 - Very small improvement
T Johnson - 22 YO - "Outstanding" Batspeed
- Before: POW 358/358/353
- After: POW 396/396/391 - Noticeable Improvement
P Skenes - 24 YO - "Successful" Pitch Movement
- Before: RAW MOV 382/382/384, HR 396/396/398, Mov OVR 401/410/407
- After: RAW MOV 389/389/384, HR 403/403/398, Mov OVR 405/414/407 - Very Small Improvement
H Smith - 23 YO - "Successful" Pitch Control
- Before: CON 277/277/270
- After: CON 274/274/268 - Small DECREASE
|
What you have matches my own experiences, which I put in another thread. Outstanding “seems” to offer up to a 10% increase in raw editor numbers, but it is very inconsistent. I have also seen NO IMPROVEMENT result in improvement and SUCCESSFUL result in a decrease. I do not think I ever saw POOR result in improvement and I did see a significant decrease there once.
Could be bad in game messaging, working as intended, who knows. It is not particularly user friendly however, particularly if you are not using commissioner mode.