Quote:
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  Syd Thrift
					 
				 
				That’s nice. Wildcat strikes are considered actionable offenses in the USA. Running backs are not going to be able to decertify and recertify all by themselves, although I’m sure the NFL would help them out all the way on the first half. Breaking up the union because one position is getting the short shrift is a terrible idea. 
			
		 | 
	
	
 Really? The NFL would rather negotiate w/one group than multiple ones. Let's not forget what came out of the Snyder report the last week, Gumbel's "leash" comment on Upshaw or the lawsuit about NFL pensions & CTE. The owners & NFLPA aren't always enemies. They have a chummy relationship until their CBA is up for negotiation and the war hawks start flappin' their wings. Imagine if RB's broke off. Then QB's will want to. Then other positions will want something. The owners don't want that. Imagine practicing w/o WR's? Imagine games w/USFL QB's? The last thing the NFL wants is the union breaking into smaller groups.
		
 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________
				If a man is guilty 
4 what goes on inside of his mind,
then let me get the electric chair
4 all my future crimes.
- Prince
Batdance
June 7, 1958 - Apr 21, 2016
Don't fall for the spin