OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post

ey215 · 11-24-2003, 07:02 PM

The last 5 years again at skkrrt's request:

ACC
PAC 10 - 5-1 .833
Big East - 18-16 .529
Big 10 - 7-7 .500
SEC - 17-17 .500
Big XII - 5-6 .455

Big East
SEC - 9-6 .600
PAC 10 - 5-5 .500
ACC - 16-18 .471
Big XII - 4-6 .400
Big 10 - 4-7 .369

Big 10
Big East - 7-4 .636
Big XII - 11-10 .524
PAC 10 - 14-14 .500
ACC - 7-7 .500
SEC - 8-10 .444

Big XII
Big East - 6-4 .600
ACC - 6-5 .545
SEC - 8-7 .533
PAC 10 - 13-15 .464
Big 10 - 10-11 .476

PAC 10
SEC - 4-0 1.000
Big XII - 15-13 .536
Big East - 5-5 .500
Big 10 - 14-14 .500
ACC - 1-5 .167

SEC
Big 10 - 10-8 .556
ACC - 17-17 .500
Big XII - 7-8 .467
Big East - 6-9 .400
PAC 10 - 0-4 .000

Some observations. I'm not going to lie I'm shocked at the turn around in some of the standings here. The ACC, Pac 10, and Big 10 all have .500 or better records against all of the other conferences except one. The Big XII has surpassed the SEC in record during this time frame and the Big East appears to have also. An arguement can be made for sample size but in the last 5 years my rankings are:

ACC
Big 10
Pac 10
Big XII
Big East
SEC

You can make a good arguement for either the ACC or the Big 10 at number one. The reason I went with the ACC is that while the Big 10 has a .500 record against the Pac 10 and ACC the ACC has an above .500 record against the Pac 10. That barely gives them the edge over the Big 10. Obiously that gives the Big 10 the same edge against the Pac 10. The Big XII has a winning record against 3 conferences including the Pac 10 and Big 10. The East edges out the SEC by having a winning head-to-head record.

All of these stats have brought me to one conclusion. I was wrong about the most underrated conference, I actually think as to head-to-head the ACC is very underrated.

11-24-2003, 07:02 PM	#93
ey215 All Star Reserve Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Woodstock, GA Posts: 581	The last 5 years again at skkrrt's request: ACC PAC 10 - 5-1 .833 Big East - 18-16 .529 Big 10 - 7-7 .500 SEC - 17-17 .500 Big XII - 5-6 .455 Big East SEC - 9-6 .600 PAC 10 - 5-5 .500 ACC - 16-18 .471 Big XII - 4-6 .400 Big 10 - 4-7 .369 Big 10 Big East - 7-4 .636 Big XII - 11-10 .524 PAC 10 - 14-14 .500 ACC - 7-7 .500 SEC - 8-10 .444 Big XII Big East - 6-4 .600 ACC - 6-5 .545 SEC - 8-7 .533 PAC 10 - 13-15 .464 Big 10 - 10-11 .476 PAC 10 SEC - 4-0 1.000 Big XII - 15-13 .536 Big East - 5-5 .500 Big 10 - 14-14 .500 ACC - 1-5 .167 SEC Big 10 - 10-8 .556 ACC - 17-17 .500 Big XII - 7-8 .467 Big East - 6-9 .400 PAC 10 - 0-4 .000 Some observations. I'm not going to lie I'm shocked at the turn around in some of the standings here. The ACC, Pac 10, and Big 10 all have .500 or better records against all of the other conferences except one. The Big XII has surpassed the SEC in record during this time frame and the Big East appears to have also. An arguement can be made for sample size but in the last 5 years my rankings are: ACC Big 10 Pac 10 Big XII Big East SEC You can make a good arguement for either the ACC or the Big 10 at number one. The reason I went with the ACC is that while the Big 10 has a .500 record against the Pac 10 and ACC the ACC has an above .500 record against the Pac 10. That barely gives them the edge over the Big 10. Obiously that gives the Big 10 the same edge against the Pac 10. The Big XII has a winning record against 3 conferences including the Pac 10 and Big 10. The East edges out the SEC by having a winning head-to-head record. All of these stats have brought me to one conclusion. I was wrong about the most underrated conference, I actually think as to head-to-head the ACC is very underrated. __________________ "It is a haunted game in which every player is measured against the ghosts of all who have gone before. Most of all, it is about time and timelessness, speed and grace, failure and loss, imperishable hope - and coming home." Ken Burns, Baseball Last edited by ey215; 11-24-2003 at 07:06 PM.