Quote:
Originally Posted by wallewalls
Yes similar for me, my game is in 2080 so I don't really have the general knowledge of all the players in the league at this point that I would have with the real MLB, and I am also just on autopilot pretty much at this point as I have nothing left to accomplish so it's more so just about seeing what my franchise players become for the rest of their career more than anything else, as I just want to get to 2100 and call it there so I cannot say whether all the deals are bad or not, but it seems to be that they are just trading for the sake of trading, which was more so my initial gripe when this issue first started.
I was hoping that with OOTP 24, I would be starting up a new long-term game finally, but I just haven't gotten very immersed in any of my attempts thus far. Maybe I will try again with some more patches,
|
In regard to the bold... My thoughts based on my observations in my game.
I don't think that they are trading just to trade. I base that first on not seeing the same guys getting traded again and again. IE once on the AI team they are sticking. Teams aren't thinking "I need a 2b, trading a LF for that 2b, and then backtracking to "I need a LF". Also, after the initial large number of trades, the volume of trades settled down to a "normal" level. To me if the AI was "trading just to trade" it would look a bit like the old "sign, release, sign". IE the trading would be on a treadmill, and not showing such a large drop in volume.
To be fair my sample size is small as I play out all of my games, so only March, April, and half of May have gone by on "average" frequency and 25/25/25/25 evaluation. Maybe when I hit the high volume of late June and July I'll see it differently.