Quote:
Originally Posted by Luidefuenesse
I‘m curious which level of supportive payments are enough in your eyes?
|
As I said, for me, less than $1 an hour is nothing to blink at.
Quote:
|
Game purchase was enough last year. Now it’s an additional monthly fee.
|
Game purchase is enough this year. If someone were to spend 7 bucks a month last year, they'd get an extremely modest advantage. Now 7 bucks a month gets you a moderate advantage. If you still don't feel that's worth $7 to you, so be it.
Quote:
|
How about another daily log on fee of 0,99 $.
|
I mean, you're moving the goalposts now, aren't you? By "log on fee," I assume you're referring to something that's necessary in order to play the game on that day. If there was no way to play PT for free, that would be different. In that case, I'd probably just play the real game.
But to answer the non-dishonest version of your question, if PT+ was raised to $1 a day/$30 a month, I probably wouldn't pay that. I'm not playing this mode of the game for more than an hour a day most days, and acquiring a few bonus packs and things wouldn't increase my enjoyment of the game enough to make that big a difference. I might chip in once or twice as a token, solely to feel I was paying my way and supporting the developers, but as a general rule, it's not a thing I'd consider a worthwhile deal.
That much having been said: if someone
did think that the added enjoyment of having a few extra packs/tournament entries/etc. was worth $30 to them, or
did feel that that was a reasonable level of support to provide the developers for the amount of enjoyment they derived from the game, I would accept that -- just as I accept the whales of the previous versions. It's not what I choose to budget my money on, but I wouldn't get mad on here for feeling differently. And I certainly wouldn't be on here asserting the moral superiority of freeloading.