Quote:
Originally Posted by thehef
I don't see it as microanalyzing. I'm just identifying the upsets by comparing win totals, and then using the metric you mentioned - salary. If most of the teams we are talking about - the upset ers and the upset ees - are all basically in the same salary range, then I don't see how we can say analytics are besting big spending...
Perhaps there is merit to your point. But unless you or someone else can explain it, the macro analysis would seem to dismiss it  |
To be honest I don't have the time or energy to research it right now. But logic seems to dictate that two $15M signings are better than one $30M signing.