Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovidequano Dovatha
What do you use for scouting rating scales? I use 1-100, generally, if not always. Just curious, that's all. Please let me know, if and when you like. Of course, I'd tend to root for the players more on the Freemans' side of things, but if their rivals don't perform well, then it's probably not as interesting, challenging, or fun to watch them compete here, you know, jg2977.
Do what you have to do in regards to making it possible for J.P. to pitch, even if you might perhaps actually have to look at my proposed profile for some help in order to do that well enough here, then. Thank you. CD out.
|
I use the standard 20-80. I guess on that scale 50 is still average. On the 1-100 scale they use increments of 1. The difference of say, a 57 vs 58 is negligible. On the 20-80 scale increments of 5 are used. The difference between a 55 and 60 is probably noticeable.
It seems that OOTP will let players be two-way if on the pitching side he's classified as a starter. Not sure why it won't work when he's in a relief or closing role. I'd rather have JP be a starter too. Although with a great closer on the mound, if Glasco has a lead in the late innings, they're certainly going to win. In the OOTP playoffs I see many blown saves, so I'm sure that it makes a huge difference with J.P. being in the closer role.
KJ Walton had a horrible year pitching. I'll have to see what happened to his ratings.