|
Don't really want to start a whole new thread for this, so I will just ask it here. When playing random debut, do you think guys from the 20's and especially the 1930's kind of get the short end of the stick offensively? I know this period of baseball was offense driven with entire teams hitting above .300, but I'm starting to wonder if random debut penalizes hitters from this period a little too much. For example, I've now seen Charlie Gehringer complete his entire career in two different random debut leagues. In each one, he was a career .270 type hitter with decent power, but in no way was he the sure fire Hall of Fame player he was in real life. I've had Gehrig be good but not great as well. Just curious as to what y'all think?
|