Currently just starting out in my Bucs save and pitched a no-no in his rookie season.
Some of the pitchers can get a bit hinky. Whereas in the screenshot below from the Test Environment, his STU and MOV are only average and his CONT really strong, check out the next screenshot, from that MLB universe of 1925.
Same stats used. Vastly different results. Haven't been able to figure out why, other than a suspicion it is due to relativity. In 1925, most of the pitchers had pretty ave STU ratings, more seen as finesse pitchers. Which left Chet and his ilk more power pitchers by comparison.
My notes for him read as follows:
- Outstanding finesse pitcher with good control.
- Wide repertoire of pitches inc: live-running FB; sweeping curve; overhand sinker; good scroog. Later learned cutter.
Which is how I've graded him here: FB 78/111; SINKER 66/98; CURVE 78/131; CUTTER 40/91; SCROOG 90/127. VELO 89-91.
But as you can see in the final screenshot, the game has moved him about a bit. VELO up a notch. GB, too. All of which has pushed his OVR / POT a level higher as a result.
So look for him to profile as per the test screenshot, but don't be surprised if he moves toward the Bucs one if that's the type of environment you're using him in.