Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad K
Do I remember correctly that with 3 year recalc the adjust/weaken number are multiplied by 3? If so a player with 899 ABs over three year is adjusted. Why? If 300 ABs is a reliable sample size playing 1 year recalc why wouldn't 300 ABs be a good sample size over three years?
|
My understanding (of this very murky subject, so I might be incorrect) is that the guy in your example would be every-so-slightly adjusted. His 899 AB's would be what they are, and the 1 AB needed to get him to 900 would be adjusted... A guy with, say, 500 AB's would have 400 AB's that were adjusted.
Again, I could be wrong but I think that's what Garlon indicated in another thread when he wrote this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garlon
When you use 5yr recalc with my suggestion of 200/67 for batters the game sums all of the player stats from the focus season, plus the two years before and after and checks if the sum of the AB is 200*5 = 1000 total AB. If a player had 900 AB over those seasons then OOTP will take those 900 AB and add in another 100 adjusted AB to make the 1000 AB and then create the ratings. So in a given season a player may have only had 125 AB, but as long as they had 1000 or more AB across 5 seasons there will be no adjustment made because they meet the requirement.
|