|
Hi, i'm korean user.
1. In the financial setting, the reserve clause option has a logic similar to that of kbo's salary adjustment.
What do you think about introducing this? At least it looks better than the current Non-escalating Arbitration.
Currently, in non-escalating arbitration, salary cuts and increases do not match the reality of kbo.
2. And there is the problem of foreign players' major league service time.
At the end of the contract period, if the player's service time is less than 8 years, they will not be released as FA.
And in reality, foreign players who advance to the kbo league cannot get the title of Rookie of the Year.
3. And from 2023, kbo will be able to have one foreign player in the minor league, one for each pitcher and one for batter.
You need other options than the option of allowing all foreign players in the minor leagues like *** or Taiwan league.
4. And there's the problem with free agents. kbo does not match A/B type, CBA type, and cash compensation type supported by ootp.
It is not kbo's fa compensation, but it seems to be a better option if you mix A/B type and cash compensation type.
Sorry for my poor English.
Last edited by spike333; 08-24-2021 at 03:11 AM.
Reason: more cleary
|