Quote:
Originally Posted by LansdowneSt
Thanks for trying to do this. I think we've been on threads together before talking about the challenges caused by the dead weight of the old naming conventions - my fg folder is as big as yours. You mention talking to the developers on how to better handle these and I agree that's vital.
I've started Excel exports of the players, tagged how many are missing, how many are poor, how many are fine, how many are great and how many are mine (I keep those - about 3,500 to 4,000 - in a separate folder to copy over reloads of projects like this).
I assume the pack will have only the Minor League IDs and when none, the Major League IDs to reduce file count?
Lastly, how can others help? I trust you will be the QA/QC to determine if offers of help are taken up and their submitted work make the pack. As one that tries to help, trust me, none of us will be offended if we try and it doesn't make it - I just think a lot of us are of similar mind and would be willing to have their few a day contribute to this ambitious goal.
|
Thanks for the offer man! I'm not sure how having multiple people working on this at this point would work. I look at my first run through these as more of a weeding out process. What I will need help on is trying to figure out which ones in the folder with the First_Last naming convention can be deleted as dupes or need to be converted to the other formats I pulled 7,000 named format files from the pack and there are roughy 6,700 left to be sifted through. Not ideal work by any means, but that is something that cane be done in paralell to what I'm doing I guess