Quote:
Originally Posted by Rain King
1.) I absolutely think your issue should get looked at (Lukas has already provided you some great support).
2.) Very few people play through 100+ years of league history and experience this issue so I do not think your issues make much of a blip on the overall "state of the game" which is how it was presented to the community.
3.) When your group started dismissing other's experiences after trying to make a case that OOTP21 is a poor version of the game for your specific reasons I took exception.
4.) Criticism of the game is great when it is done in a constructive manor. The community has worked through and helped the developers find many issues in this way. When a league decides to ambush the forum, dismisses pretty much everything a member of the OOTP team says as they try to help them and also dismisses anyone else's opinion that is no longer constructive.
|
1) Lukas absolutely has - we're all eagerly awaiting hearing back once they check out the file.
2) Yeah, but my point above is that it's 100 years now. They add more features in 22 and don't resolve this, maybe then it's 50 years. Then in OOTP23 more features and it's 25 years. If the tipping point situation Lukas stated is the real case, that tipping point will never move further away from file inception date unless they tackle it. So better to tackle it now when it's just those of us in a 100-year league and not when it's a much higher userbase because in OOTP 23 it happens after 20 years.
3) Shade dismissive yeah, but I think if one reads the OP, in the 1st sentence it becomes pretty clear that the "game" that's being talked about are longer-term leagues and files. So 3D crashing new files doesn't really advance the conversation at hand. Maybe chalk it up to poor thread titling, sure.
4) Next time we'll send a more cordial invitation? And I don't think we dismissed anything Lukas said, we more provided clarity on the situation we're experiencing. There were some assumptions in Lukas' statements that we clarified as already tried or were divergent from our 30-person user experience, so they were worth pointing out.