[Gammajamma]

I love the game and one of my favorite aspects is creating alternative histories. While OOTP is incredible in this, I do wish that the top prospects when you start the league was more accurate to what they were at the time. It feels like hindsight plays a little bit of a role to how they pan out/are rated which is natural. I noticed that a lot of the top prospects who flamed out are never highly regarded in my restarts at the beginning. Part of the appeal is having the alternative timeline is making guys stars and hall of fame talents when in reality they fizzled out. It feels cheap to me when I edit the guys to adjust their potential and I was wondering if anyone knew what I could do to have it be portrayed more accurately? For example Here are a few top 50 prospect lists from 2004-07

[https://www.mlb.com/news/2007-top-50...ist-c301612226)

[https://www.mlb.com/news/2006-top-50...ist-c301623478)

[https://www.mlb.com/news/2005-top-50...ist-c301622238)

[https://www.mlb.com/news/2004-top-50...ist-c301622276)

​

I want it so it reflects Brandon Wood, Delmon Young, BJ Upton and others as top level prospects with high potential. I want to try and win with the corey pattersons of the worlds. Any help or suggestions is much appreciated