Too many homers and triples among the leaders or league wide? You don't have too much control over the league leaders because as I mentioned they're outliers. 'Tis better to look at the depth of the field (or "down ballot" if you will
) when trying to assess how your league is doing in terms of both the offensive environment, and the individual dispersal, if you care about that sort of thing. That's what I was trying to do with the #10/#16 thing.
Also, is your observation about just the first season of your league(s), or subsequent seasons? I find the first season of any league provides strange results (both high and low in different categories) in terms of the league wide output. It seems like recalc over corrects for this in the second season, and then by the time the third season rolls around, it's smoothed out the rough edges, and starts to hone in on the league wide output of of the season you want it to.
Obviously, once it reaches this point, it doesn't produce the same AVG/OBP/SLG/OPS, R/G, ERA, 2B/AB, 3B/AB, HR/AB etc year over year, and you wouldn't want it to because that'd be boring. It does provide the same general offensive environment, and that's what I like because it allows me to compare players in terms of raw numbers
and averages across the seasons of my league. The environment will fluctuate, most likely due to changing talent levels in batting, pitching, and fielding, but generally it'll be similar over time, and if you look back after 50 seasons or so, it's scary how close those numbers are to the season you're trying to imitate.