Quote:
Originally Posted by PSUColonel
has anyone ever tried 100/0/0/0?
|
Yes, I have played 100/0/0/0 but usually play 75/25/0/0. I play historical 1901- and I want to get a sense of how the players I have read about performed in real life and feel 100/0/0/0 gives you the best chance. There is enough randomness to make it interesting. Players still hit 30 points higher or lower than their real life stats. The only thing I did not like is seeing a player that started the season in a big slump that was batting leadoff still batting leadoff near season end. With 75/25/0/0 that player would likely be moved down in the lineup. To be a purest to get a sense of how the players actually.played I think 100/0/0/0 is the best option.
If I were playing fictional I would probably play 0/50/40/10. I do not understand why some would give equal weight to 2 years ago as they give to last year stats or this year stats.