View Single Post
Old 04-11-2020, 02:43 PM   #3
Westheim
Hall Of Famer
 
Westheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 13,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigRed75 View Post
It's skewed to Lives because the supply of Live cards is greater.
I think you mean the right thing, but this is terribly formulated and could indicate the exact opposite of what it is.

More precise explanation: *A* live card is more likely to drop than *a* non-live card. (Is it still 70% live? Or did they change it to 65%? Or was it 75% in 19 and they changed it to 70% in 20? Sorry, bit fuzzy on this right now. )

Whether a *specific* live card is more likely to drop than a *specific* non-live card depends on the card supply in each group. Now, I have no idea how many historical perfects are in the game right now, but there seems to be precisely 11 live perfects. If live perfects drop at a rate of 70%, then 6.36% of all perfect cards will be a specific live card, say, Max Scherzer (which is the only one I have).

Since there is definitely *more* than 11 historical perfects, and they only represent 30% of the perfect cards, the odds are going to be much smaller for each individual historical perfect. At 20 cards it would be 1.5%; at 30 cards 1%; ... you get the idea.
__________________
Portland Raccoons, 92 years of excell-.... of baseball: Furballs here!
1983 * 1989 * 1991 * 1992 * 1993 * 1995 * 1996 * 2010 * 2017 * 2018 * 2019 * 2026 * 2028 * 2035 * 2037 * 2044 * 2045 * 2046 * 2047 * 2048 * 2051 * 2054 * 2055 * 2061
1 OSANAI : 2 POWELL : 7 NOMURA | RAMOS : 8 REECE : 10 BROWN : 15 HALL : 27 FERNANDEZ : 28 CASAS : 31 CARMONA : 32 WEST : 39 TONER : 46 SAITO

Resident Mets Cynic - The Mets from 1962 onwards, here.

Last edited by Westheim; 04-11-2020 at 02:44 PM.
Westheim is offline   Reply With Quote