Quote:
Originally Posted by pstrickert
Food for thought:
1. If you see an adjective that doesn't fit, report it here (since there's probably a quick fix): https://forums.ootpdevelopments.com/...d.php?t=299984
2. If you think the wrong person was chosen as player of the game, describe the problem in detail here (and Matt, who created the algorithm, will look into it): https://forums.ootpdevelopments.com/...lay.php?f=3961
3. If you have suggestions for extra events to include in the recaps, feel free to post them here: https://forums.ootpdevelopments.com/...lay.php?f=3866 Please note that I have already submitted a list of items to Matt, including injuries. He said none of them would be easy to add, but he'd think about it.
4. The recap database contains over 2000 entries. Entries in the most common categories number in the hundreds. When a recap draws from three or four different categories, the potential exists to create millions of different recap stories. The language is often similar, of course, because the same general event is often being described. Perhaps we could add a bit more "color" if we had more conditions. But, as it stands, most of the database entries already contain 8 or 10 or more conditions. Have we reached the point of diminishing returns? |
pstrickert, thanks for the thorough explanation of the game recap process... it's good to know that you are involved in the game recaps... I know you will do everything you can do to make it as good as possible... you are one of the most dedicated and hardworking Beta Team members I ever worked with... you are also very skilled at your duties and responsibilities... much appreciate you and your hard work.
I write my own game recaps, but I will make a point to check the ones written by the game and report the P.O.T.G picks that should be adjusted.
I will also report any adjectives that need to be changed to best fit the game performance.