Quote:
Originally Posted by BaseballMan
Only thing I am unclear on is why you think making managerial decisions based on your betting needs would not include sitting or starting a player based on whether you were betting on the game.
That is clearly what the article was saying Rose did.
Which could be true but I dont see enough evidence to support it.
|
You didn't leave it in the middle ground of indeterminable. You left it as you didn't believe Rose did it.
Anyway, I've been trying to give you an out and get out of this discussion for several posts. When you don't consider possibilities with a bit of supporting evidence and instead rely upon belief to the contrary, there's nothing left to say.
So if you want to believe Rose's desire to win and keep his job outweighed the desires of his gambling addiction, or that duct tape stops climate change, have at it.