Quote:
Originally Posted by thehef
Perhaps. But still:
1. Players cheated
2. Players admitted to cheating after immunity was given to them
So I don't see how additional evidence could lead to a justification for changing Manfred's mind unless - purely as an example - the new evidence was of a buzzer-under-uniform-scheme, and Altuve was asked for all that he knew about the cheating and he did not mention the buzzer scheme. IOW, he didn't hold up his end of the deal, thus nullifying the immunity... But simply more evidence on the trash-can-banging scheme - something they've already admitted - wouldn't suffice, I'd think.
|
I didn't explain the details of "new evidence". You have a much better explanation.