[QuantaCondor]

From which population was this data sampled? Entirely in bronze and silvers? An even mix? There is a major, major difference between the important batter and pitcher stats in, say, a silver or bronze tourney vs. open/cap/Perfect leagues/etc., as you mentioned. And if you collected data over a bunch of different types of tournaments, it might just be better to present those fits separately rather than together, otherwise it's hard to really apply any of this to a region of the game. I also am unsure if 2000 ABs is necessarily the dividing line to use. I mean, for 100 CON for example, there aren't that many players out there being used in tourneys that fit that classification, and probably most of your ABs in the limits are coming from one specific guy's team (or, at minimum, one or two players used commonly on a few different teams). Especially true for high MOV and even high CON stats as well. Or is this just raw player overall you're using on the left side there?

For hits allowed, it's especially not obvious what's the underlying statistic being compared against. Stuff? Player overall? And if it's Stuff, you might expect that a pitcher with high stuff might just end up having high other stats as well. I'd guess you would probably have to remove that correlation to get a true statement of the effect of stuff on hits allowed. There's a lot of potentially interesting data in there, but all the wires are tangled together right now and the threads need to be separated to give them all their proper context.