|
One idea I have about incentivizing the better players to limit their participation in the lower stakes tourneys they can more easily win -- enact a limit on the number of tourneys one can win/pace/show in a given day. Not going to guess at a formula, but if you knew the number of positive outcomes were hard-bracketed, common-sense would dictate limiting participation in lower-return-but-more-frequent games.
Incidentally, it's in some sense why poker players migrate from low-stakes-but-consistent-"table"-play to tournaments with lower chance of win, but better ROI so far as time/effort.
|