Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Savage_1
Do the gains in position ratings taper after a certain point rather than max out completely? Otherwise, I don't think that's the problem. I've checked a couple 1B that are over 193cm (Sam Horn 196cm and Jose Alberto Martinez 198cm) and they can both train over what their ratings would be according to the spreadsheet calculator had their height been 193cm. Although I did just notice that Freddie Freeman was out by 3 from the calculator so we're probably getting warmer as to finding the exact problem.
|
Yeah, you're right, it's not the height factor. I think it's just that the formula is ever so slightly wrong for 1B
Now I don't know if I should give the fully correct formula or not. Keep in mind some ratings may be off by up to a point due to internal issues/rounding, so that can affect things a little.
Basically, the current formula with the displayed ratings yields a 66 rating for him at 1B. If I correct the spreadsheet to include the actual formula we use it code, it would give him a 64.6 rating at 1B. He seems to have the worst case of his displayed ratings being higher than the editor ratings, so if i use the correct ratings and the correct formula, he comes out as a 62.7, which displays as 63.
Now it's up to you to fix the spreadsheet
