Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Arnold
We will take another look through player ratings for next year and see how to improve things. But as everyone else has said, you have to look at the full picture for a player instead of just the overall number. Some players, for one reason or another, have ratings that do differ from their actual value to a team.
As I said, we will certainly revisit things for next year, and our goal will certainly to not be too far off on players. However, the formulae that we use to rank players will certainly differ from everyone else's evaluation, especially when it comes to how you value speed vs defense vs power vs etc... So just because one guy is rated higher than another means he's a better player, and that goes further when you look how they specifically fit into your team or your lineup.
|
Please, PLEASE, PLEASE leave the Rating as it is. If I could assume, that a 100 Player Plays like Trout always or 78 Kopech like a 78 Kopech, how the hell I could compete against Players who simply spent Money? It is a very high part of the fun to find out, which Players give the highest bangs for bucks. And also leave the decision if it is better to buy DeGroom or Snydergaard AND Betts AND Doolitlle.