View Single Post
Old 12-06-2018, 05:48 PM   #240
Fyrestorm3
Hall Of Famer
 
Fyrestorm3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Tampa Bay, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asov View Post
I have never suggested separating F2P and P2P because is terrible.
. . .
I know im in the minority here, so i wont bother anymore, but i hope ive made myself clear at least. And again, i love the game, i will play it anyway and i wish that the devs get rich, win the nobel prize and more.
For the record, I have nothing against your idea, and I think it would be quite fun if it was implemented properly. It's just very far from the norm for this type of gamemode, and does limit the amount people will spend (even if it limits it less than other more dramatic proposals, it still limits it), and thus is unlikely to ever see the light of day.

Quote:
Originally Posted by eldur00 View Post
While it's true they don't have separated online leagues for F2P and P2W, they do offer a wider variety of modes where you're not funneled into one way to play. In DD and HUT, you have the choice to play offline to help build up your team a little bit before you try to climb the online leader ladders. That choice is not present here. It's the first year, and like I said before, it will eventually evolve into its own niche, but to say the other games don't offer different structures and play styles is incorrect.
Technically PT already has its own niche because it doesn't require any games played out by the user. And again, I never said that PT won't change or implement different ways to play (as you say, they're already doing that for OOTP20). My entire point was that the basic pay-to-win structure will never change, so I don't understand what we're even debating at this point.

Last edited by Fyrestorm3; 12-06-2018 at 05:51 PM.
Fyrestorm3 is offline   Reply With Quote