Quote:
Originally Posted by zrog2000
Think about it from OOTP's point of view. A no-money league would prevent every single owner in that league from spending money when they may have come across some extra to spend on the game. Why would they do that?
|
Some people are purists and want it that way. Others want to throw money at the problem. What's wrong with having a system that allows for more than one option for strategy?
I'm not saying all of us should run to a no $$$ league. That would be foolish. I'm saying that if possible, options might be explored so that the only option for success isn't throwing money at the problem. You'll notice I also suggested a high rollers division. My feeling is that both are needed, as well as one or more tiers in between. It's discussion. I'm a big believer in this program and its developers. I'm not a big believer in economic stratification...so I've raised the discussion, and hopefully it'll stay on a big enough road that Markus et al will find some good ideas. I don't want to see this turn into a whine-fest. That would defeat the purpose of talking.
