Quote:
Originally Posted by NoOne
round 29? yeah, probably re-using the same 'list' even with scouting inaccuracy by that time.. ie all junk and ~equivalent. each gm sees them in same rank order of reference, lol.
bet there's similarities between those GM's, or simply due to how late in draft it is that the sliders don't differentiate enough to choose a different 'next' player.
still enough 'randomness' built in for it to inherently not occur outside of 100% junk players at end.
names aren't distributed by letter when created are they? as in playerid would also be in same order? shouldn't even need to read/know/use the names for the process.
|
Yeah. I bet the AI is trying to sort by whatever evaluation it uses, and when it all comes up as the same (because the players basically all suck), it is just backstopping to sort by name as a tiebreaker.