Quote:
Originally Posted by NoOne
i can tell you for sure in OotP a slugger that walks less is 'better'. they will put up more rbi+r if they walk less. ~100+BB and they get ~10 less hr, and at least 20 fewer RBI on a ~1000run team. the loss of rbi outpaces the loss of rs @4th in the lineup for sure.
i won't go so far to say zero eye is good, but ~70-80+ kinda sucks at a slot in order you expect many rbi from.
|
Yeah, that's why I adjust all averages (batting, HRs) to Plate appearances. The adjusted figures show all that power on a guy is used slightly less as walks increase. But I wouldn't say that lower eye is preferred on these talented sluggers, but rather that eye on them offers less return on them than on other players.