Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyzalot
I could be wrong but my understanding was that it was an "overall" rating that included all the base ratings plus experience. Think about it this way. No matter how much experience some people have at a position, they will never reach a rating of 20 on a 1-20 scale. If that's the case then it can't just be a rating for experience. Like a center fielder with a range rating of 12 is unlikely to ever get a rating at center better than 10. However if you move him to left he can get well above that depending on his arm and error ratings as well.
|
Perhaps, but as I said, using the options for 'view' and exporting to html, the position rating is the only way to get at the underlying experience, so it's probably still necessary for me to include both in the regression. To be honest I don't fully trust the results of the defensive analysis I'm doing at the moment, but since it seems to roughly reproduce my 'by-eye' assessment I haven't bothered to improve it.