OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post

PSUColonel · 08-01-2017, 01:45 AM

well, the more stats heavy I go, I see some strange players put on waivers at times...however, leaning towards stats also seems to allow the AI to better utilize players in it's rotation/bullpen/lineups. Also, when going more stats heavy, it seems a bit easier to fleece the AI in trades.

So, the closer to 50/50 the better I feel, but there are advantages to both 55/25/15/5 & 45/30/30/5 IMO....I have sort of ruled out 40/30/20/10 just because it's 10 points off to 50 for ratings.

The seemingly obvious one to use might be 50/30/15/5...I think it works well, but it also really weakens the previous years stats. You might say the same about 55/25/15/5...but that's not really the case since you are lowering the current year's stats.

50/30/15/5......this year is worth 2x last years

55/25/15/5 ......this year is worth only 1.6x last years.....but in this case, ratings are 2.2x more than this year's stats.

08-01-2017, 01:45 AM	#61
PSUColonel Hall Of Famer Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 13,118	well, the more stats heavy I go, I see some strange players put on waivers at times...however, leaning towards stats also seems to allow the AI to better utilize players in it's rotation/bullpen/lineups. Also, when going more stats heavy, it seems a bit easier to fleece the AI in trades. So, the closer to 50/50 the better I feel, but there are advantages to both 55/25/15/5 & 45/30/30/5 IMO....I have sort of ruled out 40/30/20/10 just because it's 10 points off to 50 for ratings. The seemingly obvious one to use might be 50/30/15/5...I think it works well, but it also really weakens the previous years stats. You might say the same about 55/25/15/5...but that's not really the case since you are lowering the current year's stats. 50/30/15/5......this year is worth 2x last years 55/25/15/5 ......this year is worth only 1.6x last years.....but in this case, ratings are 2.2x more than this year's stats. Last edited by PSUColonel; 08-01-2017 at 02:02 AM.