probably scouting inaccuracy... because osa re-scouts same time and frequency as your team's scout.
maybe it registered as 0 potential pitch due to inaccuracy and not displayed like any other 0/200 potential pitch... definitely possible with a new pitch. it's generally ~5-20 out of 200 potential, so it's not far off from zero once rounded to your scale.
In this istuation, especially at age 25, i make organizational decision and lop off a crap pitch, lol.... like this guy i would definitely cut the new one... but the screwball i would make a decisions before 'seeing' under-the-hood... in this case likely keep it... anything near 1/2 scale i'd choose to keep (no matter what i saw in editor, if i make a decision i follow-through, even if negative impact to ~nearly simulate what happens in RL on occasion)
anything that's accurately 40-45ish/100 or less is a net-negative attribute in any ML i have created. (*tougher with lower resolution scales and scouting inaccuacy... that "40-45" is ideal and not realistic to make it a black-and-white threshold for the way most people play... more feedback involved in the decision)
even though a 10/200 pitch won't be used often, i don't want it used at all! LoL... and i can make it so, easily. a slightly below average pitch for a 3rd RP pitch isn't so bad.. in fact can be helpful... SP, i want a bit more out of the third pithc, but 5th starter or Long-reliever, it's no problem. i may not want my CL or SU throwing a sub-standard pitch, though... would rely on stats to flesh out any situation that's not obvious -- preferably not in the ML or with another team, if so.
