|
I believe the average listed for players in the editor, and the average that is listed when the scout gives their ratings, are not always looking at the same values. I might be off on this, but some differences:
-In the editor, we do not check your league modifiers. So if your league is set to have a higher or lower average, or perhaps if you have higher or lower modifiers for the ratings, those will be factored into the scout opinion, but are not in the average listed in the editor. This can also factor in heavily for guys who are more skewed - if the guys average is because of massive power, and your league suppresses HR, then the scouting page will list his average much lower than the editor will.
-In the scouting report, the average and such listed there will be a rounded value, and not the raw value. For example, if a guy is a 149 contact in the editor, then we map that to the 2-8 scale for your scouting report, for example, which maps to a 6 (for example). Then everyone who's scouting report maps to a 6 gets assigned an average. So someone who's a 149 will show as the same average as someone who's a 129, as they might both map to the same value.
-This also gets confusing if you have relative ratings enabled, since then things can also map a little weirdly. But I forget exactly how that happens.
-Scouting reports will also be a snapshot in time, so if the scouting report is from a few weeks ago, the guy may have gained points as well.
Basically, they won't match, and that's known. The biggest change is the first point, because league values can certainly shift the ratings a lot.
|