OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post

jpeters1734 · 02-10-2017, 08:19 AM

I think your personality study has a slight flaw. You don't take into account the ratio of initial creation. Meaning, what percentage of players were created with a high WE? If 19% of all amateurs are created with a high WE and 10 years later 19% of those amateurs made the ML, you can conclude that high WE has no effect at all.

The question shouldn't be how many ML players are there with high WE. It should be, what percent of players created with high WE make the ML, and what percentage of players created with a low WE make it.

02-10-2017, 08:19 AM	#16
jpeters1734 Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: Juust a bit outside... Posts: 6,289	I think your personality study has a slight flaw. You don't take into account the ratio of initial creation. Meaning, what percentage of players were created with a high WE? If 19% of all amateurs are created with a high WE and 10 years later 19% of those amateurs made the ML, you can conclude that high WE has no effect at all. The question shouldn't be how many ML players are there with high WE. It should be, what percent of players created with high WE make the ML, and what percentage of players created with a low WE make it. __________________ "Cannonball Coming!" Go Bucs!! Founder and League Caretaker of the Professional Baseball Circuit, www.probaseballcircuit.com An Un-Official Guide to Minor League Management in OOTP 21 Ratings Scale Conversion Cross-Reference Cheat Sheet Last edited by jpeters1734; 02-10-2017 at 08:21 AM.