|
I "cheat" and look at coach ratings also. That isn't realistic-- I know too much-- but the default of basically knowing nothing isn't realistic either.
As I remember it, it used to provide almost as much info as one would get by looking at ratings-- which was unrealistically easy. Now, you have no idea how good someone is without looking at ratings, which is unrealistically hard.
They need to have a middle ground, maybe an "interview coach" function that provides a (definitely imperfect) estimate of the coach's abilities.
And if the AI knows exactly how good the coaches are, that should be changed so that AI teams are dealing with the same level of haze as human teams.
|