OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post

Spritze · 05-05-2016, 04:40 PM

Here is the ss 3b data for the 2 st. louis teams in 1925.

Not a big range in range. Should it be larger or are most fielders in general average? If they were not at least average-ish they would be minor leaguers?

Third basemen are only compared to other third basemen in MLB in 1925. etc. range is 43-56, for SS 46-53 MLB average is 50.

This example has the best fielders 12% better than average and the worst 14% below average.

Generally no one gets rated below 20 nor higher than 80. Hey! that matches OOTP's 20-80 default scale!

05-05-2016, 04:40 PM	#18
Spritze OOTP Historical Czar Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Bothell Wa Posts: 7,253	Here is the ss 3b data for the 2 st. louis teams in 1925. Not a big range in range. Should it be larger or are most fielders in general average? If they were not at least average-ish they would be minor leaguers? Third basemen are only compared to other third basemen in MLB in 1925. etc. range is 43-56, for SS 46-53 MLB average is 50. This example has the best fielders 12% better than average and the worst 14% below average. Generally no one gets rated below 20 nor higher than 80. Hey! that matches OOTP's 20-80 default scale! Attached Images __________________ It's madness, madness, I tell you! For the love of God, don't do it! Last edited by Spritze; 05-05-2016 at 05:05 PM.