Quote:
Originally Posted by Exodor
You can see the personality ratings on the "BNN Page" of each player or create a custom view that shows the ratings. You won't get the actual values but you can get an idea of their relative ratings.
I like to leave the system on but it's incredibly frustrating to have to guess at who the problem players might be. A player on my terrible '57 A's team just sent me this message:
And the next day another player sends this:
What am I supposed to do with that? Right now all I can do is look at the leadership ratings and guess who might be the troublemakers. Give me names so I can decide - if the troublemaker plays like Barry Bonds I may keep him and get rid of the complainers, or I may try to trade him for whatever I can get just to get him off my team.
What I don't want to do have to do is guess. |
I typically scroll through player profile screens at that point. The offending player(s) will usually stand out because they're not complaining about team chemistry in the morale section. When I find a player that isn't complaining and whose personality scouting blurb indicates an attitude issue then I'm 99% confident he's the problem or at least one of them.
That being said I completely agree with lots of the points made here. You get one email per season on chemistry and your bench coach doesn't name names either. That's silly, it's his job. Those emails should be more frequent, even if only when there are chemistry problems. And he should absolutely point out specific players.
I only play with morale sometimes because it's an extra challenge. One thing I absolutely agree with the system on is that winning should be a major component. I like to say that winning creates good team chemistry, not vice versa.