View Single Post
Old 03-25-2016, 10:44 AM   #4
cheo25
All Star Starter
 
cheo25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,334
I will disable historical minors. The historical minors idea is a good one, in theory, from an affliates standpoint. I like having the historical minor-league affiliates.

But it's not worth it for me if I can't keep career minor-leaguers from reaching the majors or if I can't keep minor-leaguers from reaching the majors early. Pat Zachry showed up for the Reds in '75, even though he didn't make his MLB debut until '76. I don't mind real-life players switching teams, having varied performances, etc. I guess I just draw the line at who's included in a player pool in MLB for a given season.

This is not a complaint, just an observation. Others may like that variation, and I certainly understand and respect that. Like I said, I think the historical minors option has its merit and potential.

And thanks to all who commented for helping me understand and/or confirm what was becoming apparent to me. Thanks!

Last edited by cheo25; 03-25-2016 at 10:46 AM.
cheo25 is offline   Reply With Quote