Quote:
Originally Posted by Nez477
This is what I'm really hungry for. As it currently stands, you don't really know when you are taking a "risk" on a prospects potential vs. a "safe" pick.
What I'd love is the following (1-10 scales)
- SS Spec with 8/9/7/9/6 potential. 5-star spec. But.... scouts question his devotion. Or scouts are concerned about his power rounding out. Something in game says "this guy could be a stud, but there are concerns"
- LF Spec with 7/7/6/8/6 potential. 4-start spec. But..... he's really close to being a slam dunk.
Then you have the tough choice. Go with the slam dunk or go for the risk?
Or is this maybe not a reasonable ask? I feel, like kevrock said, there are sometimes some slam dunk prospects in the drafts nowadays. There should be SOME sort of differentiation on the risk factor IMO |
Something similar to this could be very very interesting