OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post - Historical players defensive values too high?

Peregrine · 03-18-2016, 06:23 PM

Not sure if I'm making too much of this but every historical game I've played so far almost all the players have a positional rating of near max - I mean one team might be this way but this seems to be pretty much across the board.

I know this wasn't this way in 16, has something changed? Something seems off here.

Example here, using the 1980 Brewers team in the two versions.

OOTP 16 - nice dispersion of positional ratings (using 1-20 scale)

OOTP 17 - same team, mostly same players but positional ratings so much higher!

03-18-2016, 06:23 PM	#1
Peregrine All Star Reserve Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Cary, North Carolina Posts: 635	Historical players defensive values too high? Not sure if I'm making too much of this but every historical game I've played so far almost all the players have a positional rating of near max - I mean one team might be this way but this seems to be pretty much across the board. I know this wasn't this way in 16, has something changed? Something seems off here. Example here, using the 1980 Brewers team in the two versions. OOTP 16 - nice dispersion of positional ratings (using 1-20 scale) OOTP 17 - same team, mostly same players but positional ratings so much higher! __________________ The only thing I know about [baseball] strategy is that everything the manager does is crap. Unless it works, in which case he's a button pusher. --Moe Szyslak, the Simpsons